The Right Hand Path

I have written several posts about the Left Hand Path since that is the way my religious and magical philosophy is often described and characterised. Tilda at Swift Expressions recently suggested it would be interesting to get my perspective on what the reverse of the Left Hand Path actually means. Of course I can only give a view from the path I walk myself but I see it as an interesting challenge to explain the Right Hand Path and I will try to be as objective and factual as possible despite my clear leanings in the other direction.

The distinctions Right Hand and Left Hand Path are usually only applied to traditions which are associated with the occult and magic but they can sometimes be applied to any religion or philosophical tradition. Generally the labels are used more specifically to differentiate Left Hand Path practitioners from those on the Right Hand Path who are often regarded as being the norm that Left Handers deviate from. Hence, many Right Hand Pathers don’t even recognise or use the term to refer to themselves. The terms left-hand and right-hand paths in Western occultism are often attributed to Theosophy founder Helena Blavatsky but in fact can be traced back to various Eastern practices and definitions.

Broadly Right Hand Paths are often regarded as good whereas the left is attributed with evil and weakness. Clearly I view that as a gross and misleading over-simplification. Right Hand Paths usually place emphasis on submission to authority (usually God), an unchangeable moral code (often said to be based on some form of God’s law), a degree of self denial and aspirations to altruism. In terms of magic The Right is associated with benevolent “white” magic as opposed to what is seen as selfish and sometimes evil “black” magic as practised by those on the left. Within these broad terms the vast majority of religions including everything from Islam and Christianity to Druidry and Wicca are usually described as Right Hand Paths.

Now many of these attributes of the RHP sound good and wholesome in the light of contemporary western standards and morals; so why would anybody want to deviate from them unless they were bad and evil people? Let’s look more closely.

Right Hand Paths tend to emphasize submission to God, the church and the creed and doctrine thereof. They believe in respecting deity as something far superior to ourselves and therefore tend to believe it is presumptuous or foolish to question or challenge something that is so much wiser and more knowing than our own limited knowledge of the universe. Great merit is attached to acts of faith; to admitting ones lack of understanding (or perhaps conviction) and simply obeying the will of God (usually as translated by “The Church”. Some of the people held in esteem by such religions are people who have put their own doubts aside and carried out God’s will by faith alone.

Personally I think there is a place for faith, for admitting that we don’t know everything and choosing to trust our instincts or a particular element of belief which cannot be proved logically. However, I reserve the right to take that approach on a case by case basis and not base my entire spiritual life on turning my reasoning switch off. In my opinion living by faith alone leads to fundamentalism and makes a person both unreasoning and unreasonable. One of the awful things about the evil people who hijacked planes to crash them into the world trade center on September 11th is that no amount of reasoning could have stopped them. Their particular perverted form of Islam had driven them beyond reason and the pleas of the innocents on those planes who must have begged them to think again about what they were doing. And there are plenty of times when fundamentalists from Christianity and other religions of the right hand path have acted just as insanely.

Submission to outside authority whether it be The Church, doctrine or God him/herself is not something that those of us who lean to left generally do very much. We venerate ourselves, by which we mean we use the brains we have to work things out for ourselves as much as possible and we take credit both for our triumphs and our mistakes. We acknowledge our own powers and the Spiderman maxim that with great power comes great responsibility. Many Left Hand Pathers are in essence atheists, but even those of us who believe in deity have quite a different relationship with our Gods and Goddesses. We may sometimes choose to submit to our deity but it is in pretty much the same way that you might occasionally choose to submit to a lover in a way that is satisfying to both. In general we believe our deities expect us to learn and grow through our own efforts as well as by their inspiration and guidance.

In regard to ethics Right Hand Paths tend to defer to  an unchangeable moral code often said to be given by God such as The Ten Commandments. They tend to believe in certainties and sometimes struggle in the grey areas that many moral questions are found in. I would love to believe there were some moral absolutes and I think perhaps there are in a democratic sense. However like most Left Handers I have come to believe that most morality is relative and the most any individual can do is be true to their own moral code. So again the difference here is that those on the RHP submit to outside authority while those on the left try to be more self reliant. Some might call that arrogance; I prefer to think of it as intelligent personal responsibility. To put it another way there will be those on the right who believe I am a bad person for using birth control or for being bisexual because their authorities tell them so. I’d prefer people to use their own brains and their own judgement.

Many right hand paths seem to advocate self denial and the good of the many as opposed to the good of the one (unless that “one” is God). They view those of us on the left as being self centered and self serving in a very negative sense. While, to be fair, they usually admit their failings, they aspire to be selfless and altruistic. They aim to serve their community and serve their God. On the surface this may seem like a good thing and very worthy aspiration; but is it really? It can easily lead to a feeling of moral superiority and often quite hypocritical self satisfaction. On the left we put ourselves first and are honest about it. This does not mean we can’t or don’t do many things to help our neighbors and our community. I like to think I am a kind and generous person and I support several charities. However I believe that in helping others there is usually a personal pay-off as well, even if that is just a warm feeling inside.  Perhaps there are a few people who are truly altruistic and if they are also effective in the way they choose to help others and if they make a positive difference in the world then they have my respect. Very often however I think those who claim to be the most altruistic are in fact quite hypocritical and self serving on many levels.

I think it is good and wise to help other people and other animals. I also think it is good and wise to look after yourself first. In the fight against poverty and injustice, sad defeated and dead soldiers are no help to anybody.

Finally I come to the subject on which the Right and Left Hand paths are most commonly compared, magic and the occult. There may be a few people reading this who think that magic and the occult do not exist within the mainstream religions. I don’t have the time to debate that in this post but I would suggest such people spend a little time on the internet and they will find that magical practitioners exist in pretty much all religions. However in present times witchcraft, magic and the occult are probably most famously and openly practiced in Neo-Pagan and New Age religious movements. It is here that the lines between right and left are drawn most clearly. Those on the right claim only to use so called “White Magic”; magic that harms nobody, magic that is kind and beneficial and principally worked on behalf of others. White light is symbolic of purity and goodness and while practitioners on the RHP may invoke good, kind hearted entities they spurn the invocation of more “dangerous” darker energies in magical workings. They completely disassociate themselves from those of us who may sometimes use “Black Magic”, who may conjurer demons or work magic for selfish personal ends.

But are these boundaries really so clearly drawn? Personally, I think not.

Even now the words witch and witchcraft are synonymous in many people’s minds with the most grotesque misconceptions of evil and the satanic. For many centuries people could be put to death on the mere suspicion that they practiced witchcraft (indeed in some parts of the world this is still true today). So even now those of us who openly identify as witches risk far more than mere ridicule. Thus modern traditions which include witchcraft have been eager to redefine what witchcraft is and disassociate themselves completely from anything that could resemble popular misconceptions of  “Black Magic”. Perhaps the best known neo-pagan religion that is open about using witchcraft is Wicca.

I learned most of my craft as part of a Wiccan coven and I still have great respect and reverence for many Wiccan beliefs and practices. But while I understand why they don’t want to be associated with the darker side of magic and why they are often keen to trumpet their “Harm None” rule, I think in practice they are being a little economical with the truth. Even in basic ritual and elementary magic Wiccans do invoke and engage with entities and energies that would not exactly be at home on The Disney Channel! Of course Wiccans are essentially good people and the majority of their magic is about helping people; but the magical tools they use are no more squeaky clean than those that I use.

The truth is that magic itself is not really black or white. It is best viewed as a tool that can be used for good or ill depending on the intention and personality of the practitioner. Doctors sometimes use poisons and dangerous radiation therapy to cure people. Those same things could just as easily be used to kill people. Skill and intention are always key.

Where there may be a significant difference is that those of us on the Left Hand Path, generally don’t subscribe to religious moral codes about what we will or won’t use our magic for. We don’t promise to harm none, we don’t state that we won’t use magic in revenge or to further our own needs. Of course that does not mean that we devote all our time to magically doing all the things that would be forbidden anywhere else. It simply means that we live by our own moral judgments and we take the responsibility and consequences for what we do. And that in essence is it…

Those on the Right Hand Path live their lives and do what they do based on their trust of other people’s rules. Those on the Left Hand Path live and do as they judge best. There are good and bad people in both camps.


13 Comments on “The Right Hand Path”

  1. Interesting . I think that in Christianity as a whole there is a something akin the Right and Left paths. The Apostle Paul for instance began his career as a Right Path Pharisee but became a sort left pather who lived through his faith in Christ Jesus instead.

    Be Blessed,


  2. Would you say that link living by faith is left pather?

    • Cassie says:

      I guess it depends how you define “faith” but personally I would say no since faith usually implies believing something without question. To me the Left Hand Path does not rule out an element of faith but the emphasis is on trusting your own “reason”. In other words, putting everything to the test and coming to your own conclusions.

  3. “The truth is that magic itself is not really black or white. It is best viewed as a tool that can be used for good or ill depending on the intention and personality of the practitioner. ”
    – I think that is key and really profound. i belief in that principal in all aspects of life. Our character and core is formed by out intent and actions. Whatever someone may call it, power, magic, religion, divine intervention…those entities just are. Its our actions and intent that maybe good or bad.

  4. A secret is that there is no such thing as magic. There is only what is.

    • Cassie says:

      I am not sure what you mean. I am sure “there is only what is”, but “What Is” contains many things which are difficult to explain fully. Magic is one of the things that is part of “What Is”.

      • I realize that magic “works”, at least for some. Back in the day most people I knew who were doing magic etc. were dabbling and had no idea what they were attempting to access. They spoke of cute little garden dragons, for instance…

        Magic often has a ritualistic element to it. Not to be overly cliche` or simplistic, but there is the do such this with that at this time kind of thing to get a specific result. Stepping away from the ritual teaches one that that these things are unnecessary and that one may do what one may without the perceived aid of others. As one grows, one realizes the vastness of what “is” especially when compared to one’s self. The key to being effective is letting go of one’s ego, after all. It is a simple matter then to turn one’s self over to the One who is. Spiritually speaking the supernatural (also an awkward term) possibilities that are open to a Spirit-filled Christian far outweigh those of other paths, as exciting as those paths may seem at the time.

  5. I mean no offence. And thank you for the award nomination.

  6. I feel we are all one and what hurts one hurts all. There are many religions to which you can belong and to whose beliefs you can faithfully hold but ultimately (with the help of the powers that be which you are a part of) you find your own hopefully in this life time. Once we realize that the beliefs and concepts we were brought up with are not necessarily the truth or our truth, we develop our own perceptions of what is and formulate our own “theories.” Your experience is not my experience except when we are eventually all one.

  7. lizellouw says:

    You have interesting viewpoints though I guess we will never agree because we (respectably) share different faiths. Though it does irritate me greatly when atheists or satanists (and even some misled Christians) say that the building blocks of my religion (Christianity) rests on the law. We were set free from the law by Christ and we no longer live or die under it, but in the new way of following the Spirit of God. God is a gentle soul and does not force anyone to do anything, therefore I do not choose my actions based on a law or because I have submitted my free will in any way, I choose my actions by knowing that when I do follow the Spirit, I am helping countless people and I will continue to receive God’s grace and joy. I do not mean offence, I just think when non-Christians write about Christianity they should be sure of the facts, just as I would not write about your religion without being sure of my facts.

  8. starlight says:

    I’d like to talk to you (why specifically you, is because I read your article and thought it was well written, there aren’t a LOT of topic’s about this). I wanted to talk in some depth about what you thought MY path was. I’ve read a bunch of things and sort of have conflicting or varied interests in spirituality!

    Yet what I do sort of falls into the middle of all the paths, or at least doesn’t fit into a normal category.

    I have some serious issue with standard religions which promote blind faith (which I believe to be corrupt, control mechanisms built from the top in order to manipulate and control people through guilt, fear and shame).

    I’m fascinated by spiritual things, astral things, and energy work.

    My chosen path is basically ‘kundalini’, that is, ‘whatever works’ and since the methods I use are very rare, I naturally feel alienated from all main groups.

    I’m after self empowerment, awareness, bliss and love. But I also know that I am going to submit to something greater than myself. What I submit to is not a loose concept of societal morals, but the very intuition which flows out of my heart and guides me. It comes from within, not some god which is separate from myself.

    I’m looking to break free from the control structure.

    I also have a general and personal view on morality, which is just generally do to others as you want done to yourself – however in some instances, people need harsh treatment.

    I had problems because I once wanted to ‘help’ people, after I became more aware, I started to question what ‘helping’ really meant? Many of the problems people face are arranged as life lessons to help them grow and develop, fixing these problems for free would just interfere. So what is ‘helping?’ Is it helping their lower selfish ego’s to temporarily feel better? or helping their higher soul to learn it’s lessons?

    Within me I also have different soul fragments (some pretty dark, selfish ego’s which are quite pleasure-seeking), I also have an inner spirit which is so pure – it is a part of God and want’s to go back home.

    Feel free to leave any comments! Look forward to hearing from you.


  9. Given that freeing the own self from an overdose of familial and religious imprint and indoctrination is even expected by scientific mainstream, such alone seems a lesser problem for starters.

    Besides that your article is certainly among the better (and clearly among the less dysfunctional & less drug-crazed) approaches. Thanks for sharing it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.